On Wednesday Uber, the highest valued company in the world, announced that it is coming to Oakland!
The company is buying the Sears building, for a total of 330,000 square feet of space. The Sears building can house 3,000 employees, and this move would allow Uber to possibly become Oakland’s largest employer that isn’t a government agency or medical center.
This is obviously a big deal for Oakland, a city that has been seeing something of an emerging tech ecosystem in recent years.
But is this actually a good thing for the city and the people who live there? Will Uber’s presence help the ecosystem flourish, or will it be the beginning of Oakland becoming like the rest of the Bay Area: overpriced and essentially uninhabitable for the average worker?
Who better to ask than those who live and work there already, and have deep ties to the city of Oakland. The reaction to the news was overall pretty positive, though there was some trepidation for what it may mean going forward.
Uber’s decision reflects how Oakland’s tech scene is becoming more dynamic than ever. We moved here 3 years ago to tap into the diverse talent pool of this community, and I’m confident that Uber will benefit from the unique energy of Oakland.
We’ve had a long relationship with the company, and Freada was recently invited to lead a hidden bias talk with their employees and executives. This move is a tremendous opportunity for Oakland and also for the larger goal of bringing new ideas, experiences and perspectives into tech. We look forward to working with Uber.”
OppSites assists communities to unlock the value of underutilized property, especially where new development supports their goals for becoming more economically and environmentally sustainable. Of course, this investment by Uber, and the 2,000 plus employees that are expected to work in the east bay will have a great multiplier effect, increasing the value of adjacent properties, while driving demand for business services, retail and restaurants. The other likely impact is that such a move will most certainly drive demand for what is already an arguably overheated housing market.
The city should consider this milestone a great success, and with this success comes great responsibility to ensure that Downtown and adjacent neighborhoods continue to grow while protecting and enhancing the quality of life for existing and future residents.”
Oakland has an identity that needs to be preserved. Residents that have been here for generations do not want Oakland to become an extension of Silicon Valley or SoMa. This investment is great for downtown, but it is just the beginning and it requires strategic community engagement to help Oakland thrive into the future. #townbizness”
Do we care about retaining what makes Oakland ,Oakland? Passionately, ‘yes.’ Does a large tech tenant such as Uber bring jobs and prosperity to downtown? Most definitely, and opportunity for significant non-tech job creation and challenges to provide affordable housing and not displace residents and the very real growing pains that a city that’s returning to economic prosperity must face. But do we believe that Uber itself, or a strong and inclusive tech economy, will ‘strip its soul the way that it is doing in parts of San Francisco,‘ a fear suggested in the article in the SF Chronicle? I don’t think so.”
The Bay Area loves entrepreneurs and cultural creatives and innovators. We are a start-up culture and this is inspiring! The flip side is that we are anti-institutional and anti-establishment. So, when these start-ups get too big and institutionalize, we protest and revolt: Google is violating my privacy rights! Facebook is commodifying my life! Uber is using surge prices to capitalize on calamities! Peets is now in the Cincinnati Airport for crying out loud! Let’s stick it to the man—I’m going to Philz now because there are only like 12 of them! I love it that we protest and revolt—but, perhaps, rather than protesting any and all business coming into Oakland we can level our revolt against inhumane, inequitable practices they might incorporate. Uber is guilty of its fair share and the Oakland citizenry could agitate with a not-in-my-backyard approach. We could urge Uber toward hiring Oakland residents, developing an affordable housing building, etc.”
Just imagine what a collaboration between Uber, Kapor Center, longstanding Oakland community groups, and other tech companies could build. Uber has proven it can think creatively about new models, so we’d be eager to work with them on new models for an Oakland tech ecosystem.”
Not unlike the Twitter example in San Francisco (Market Street/Measure E), things are complicated by decisions made regarding how monies will be allocated and for who’s benefit.
Let’s be clear, I am a capitalist. In fact, I am a Venture Capitalist… the best or worst kind! I like the idea of, and the prospects and promise and hope of, what this move could mean for helping to transform Oakland (which started back with Mayor Eliju Harris) even further. But I am from Richmond (Oakland’s close 1st cousin) and I have certain sensibilities to my folks from the Town. I would simply ask that the people making this happen ponder the utility of offering tech workshops and coding classes to my friends who are challenged with drug addiction?
Go Uber!! And please be as wise and innovative in Oakland as you were with surge pricing.”
I also have a challenge for Uber – to not just be “in” Oakland, but to be *part* of Oakland – to embody the creativity and diversity of this incredible city. Let’s make Uber the showcase of what a world-class, inclusive, company can be!
Welcome to Oakland folks!”
(Image source: uber.com)