The other day, I heard someone was taking photos of my home. At first blush, it raised concerns about the rationale behind the picture taking. It also occurred to me that it might be someone providing photos for Google Street View. Don’t ask me why I thought of that. Nonetheless, in my opinion, taking photos for Street View is OK with me, even if the house was on road marked: private.
And, apparently the U.S. District Court for Western Pennsylvania thinks so as well. A Pittsburgh couple lost a suit, claiming that Street View is an invasion of privacy.
Here’s from CNet: Aaron and Christine Boring sued the Internet search giant
last April, alleging that Google “significantly disregarded (their)
privacy interests” when Street View cameras captured images of their
house beyond signs marked “private road.” The couple claimed in their
five-count lawsuit that finding their home clearly visible on Google’s
Street View caused them “mental suffering” and diluted their home
value. They sought more than $25,000 in damages and asked that the
images of their home be taken off the site and destroyed.
However, the U.S. District Court for Western Pennsylvania wasn’t impressed by the suit and dismissed it (PDF) Tuesday, saying the Borings “failed to state a claim under any count.”
For its part, Google has said that it’s legally allowed to photograph private roads because in the age of satellite and aerial imagery – there is no such thing as privacy. Back in June 2008, Google said in response to the complaint that, “Today’s satellite-image technology means that…complete privacy does
not exist.”
(Image source:farm2.static)
